Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
As our world becoming increasingly globalized, household and industrial waste have been increased these days which sparked heating debate between people. While there are two main reasons of producing the high amount of garbage, this essay will discuss possible solutions to tackle this significant issue.
One of the major reason associated with production of large garbage is the rapidly increasing population. Due to higher population, people are producing a significant amount of waste which is quite detrimental to environment as well as people's physical health. This will directly lead to land and atmospheric pollution. For example, this extreme pollution can lead to severe health problems such as respiratory disease. Another potential cause of high littering is lack of awareness and less attention to environment effects. Some people are not aware about the adverse effect of throwing garbage and they will deliberately litter around without the knowledge of serious consequences. However, this major issue can only be solved if more strict legislations will be implemented by the authorities.
There are multiple potential solutions to deal with ongoing concern. Firstly, implementing strict regulation will certainly help in reduction of the extremely higher waste. For example, if government put hefty amount of penalties who intentionally throw rubbish, there would be significant improvement
in situation. Another possible remedy government can introduce is the establishment of newer garbage bins at close destinations. This will allow public to throw garbage in the dust bins instead of keeping with them. Therefore, if all these actions would follow by the people, world can see the greater improvement in downward trend of rubbish.
In conclusion, although heavy population and lack of awareness are potential causes of higher waste, more stringent rules will certainly change the mentality of public. The more people are educated about environment effect, less would litter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 56
- Last week you were on a flight to London Unfortunately when you got off the plane you left a bag there You did not remember about the bag until you got to your hotel Write a letter to the airline In your letter explain what has happened describe the bag a 87
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
- Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life Why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed in life 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92296652963 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9197409249 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160041616555 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466714087719 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038700084686 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863010411665 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00745622855537 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92296652963 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9197409249 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160041616555 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466714087719 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038700084686 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863010411665 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00745622855537 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.