One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.
Do you this the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
As with numerous other fields of science, the medical sciences are unprecedentedly flourishing. This has resulted in a noticeable boost to how long people do live. In my opinion, this progress is profoundly constructive and while it might bring about certain complications, the overall transition is towards a better life.
The past few decades have provided the medical society with outstanding means of treatment and hence has resulted in an elongated life for the populace. This development has bestowed upon the populace. Firstly, people get to relax more after retirement and enjoy their free time. Many hard workers in previous generations have had a very minute time after retiring due to the short life expectancy. As an instance of this, many countries are postponing retirement since the workforce are healthier at older age comparing to former generations. Secondly, the elderly will get the chance to interact more with their families and loved ones before passing away. This should be a cherished opportunity for the youth, as well as the grownups since it is a constructive and undeniably positive development. For example, I never got to see my maternal grandparents because of their death before my birth and I always envy not having the relationship. All in all, individuals and families benefit from the longer life expectancy on the counts of socialization and quality of life.
On the other hand, while not directly traced to the elongation of life, certain issues can suffer from this phenomenon. Considering the business world, with a higher age of retirement, vacancies would not be created to be filled with younger applicants. We witness the decline of graduates in countries with increasing life expectancy. Japan, for example, has regulated the exit policy for senior employees so that the new generations have a better chance of success in the business world. Moreover, in various cases, the sole fact of longer life expectancy does not suffice to qualify as an elevated quality of life. Staggering counts of elder patients whom are suffering from incurable diseases are merely kept alive with the assistance of cutting edge pharmaceuticals and devices, occasionally against their will. The single quality of being alive should not be considered as a fulfilling life and in some cases can be an abomination. As a tangible example, several countries around the world have issued a ban or specific regulations against extraordinary measures of resuscitation.
To conclude, I sincerely advocate the positivity of increased life expectancy. Although there are complications or unwanted byproducts to the trend, the overall progress if for the better and elevated the general lifestyle.
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 84
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree? 88
- Can money bring happiness? What are the factors for happiness? 80
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 89
- In some societies, it is increasingly common to try to achieve good health and fitness through physically demanding sports, special diets, or preventative medicine conventional or alternative. Some people, however, believe that the best way to stay fit an 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32325581395 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03831757977 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6967083489 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.045454545 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183906302151 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056780093102 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596013174757 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113268452763 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659989882925 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.