One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion?
In recent times, the surge in traffic congestion has become the most pressing issue of all pertaining to urban life. In this regard, one solution proposed, other than underpass, is to introduce sky-trains, which move lofted and high above the heads of people. Although the cost of building infrastructure for sky-train is too high, there are many advantages associated with it.
One evident benefit of building sky-trains is that they will not be affected by the traffic on roads; hence, they will be able to reach their destination in time, and, consequently, more people will use them as a mode of commute. Another reason that building sky-trains will be advantageous is that it will reduce the number of conflict points; as a result, chances of train accidents will plummet substantially. Consequently, it will make the train a safer mode of travel.
On the other hand, there are obvious disadvantages to building sky-trains. Firstly, building the infrastructure requires a hefty budget compared to the other solutions, which the developing countries cannot afford. For instance, sky-trains were introduced by the government of Pakistan in big cities, but it attracted a lot of criticism from the common people and the experts alike, as the people of Pakistan termed it as superfluous. According to the people, the folks are facing bigger problems, such as poverty and terrorism, and, hence, authorities should have used those resources to overcome such problems. Secondly, overhead-bridges are more prone to damage in natural disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes. Therefore, there will be an omnipotent threat to such infrastructures, resulting in exuberantly high repair and maintenance costs.
In conclusion, despite the disadvantages associated with building sky-trains, the safety they promise, along with other advantages, cannot be overlooked. The countries which can afford to build sky-trains should consider this solution to overcome the traffic congestion problems.
- You were hurt in a minor accident in a supermarket, and you wish to complain to the supermarket,Write a letter to the manager of the supermarket. In your letter- Say who you are- Give details about the accident- Suggest how the supermarket could prevent s 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as a cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Men sports get more attention than women sports. In your opinion, it is a positive or negative development. Please give your opinion. 84
- The Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in a effort to deal withthe health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly high repair and maintenance costs. In conclusion, despite the disadvantages...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52941176471 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1449048887 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7559883756 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22644778867 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808449002294 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627854005547 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150305206519 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536696913097 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.