The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undoubtedly the case that urban areas around the world increasingly suffer from traffic. Although few individuals suggest that the sole way to reduce it is to reduce the need for driving to workplaces, schools and colleges and go shopping, I do not concur with this statement and will provide my opinion with examples in the essay below.
On one hand, those who advocate people should stay and do their daily chores from home itself may argue that doing so will reduce congestion drastically and they will get a good amount of time to spend with their near ones. If people, will not drive, there will be no vehicles on the road. For example, people working in the IT industry can work from home and go to the office only for some meetings and students can study online. The same goes for purchasing as well, there are a lot of online shopping websites that can be taken advantage of. Hence, people can do their duties from home and spend the time they used to travel to play with their kids or watching movies together. Another benefit of preferring to work from home is that individuals will save a lot of money which they used to spend on petrol and their car maintenance.
On the other hand, in my view, one cannot stay at their houses forever and not all jobs allow work-from-home. For instance, a construction worker or a staff in an automobile repair shop in a city has to travel daily to construct a building or to repair vehicles. Additionally, there are a lot of shops in cities that are at risk of going bankrupt since there will be no buyers to buy their products, such as a coffee shop selling coffee or hot pancakes. People have to go out of their homes for many other reasons as well. There are a lot of individuals who travel to meet family and friends and spend quite a time socializing and visiting entertainment centers. If they will just stay at home, they will be at risk of going maniac.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of people getting an opportunity to spend moments with family and saving money, if they work from home, we must take into consideration that, not all jobs have that flexibility, a lot of businesses are at risk of shutting down and people need to travel for socializing as well. Personally, I feel that these drawbacks are quite big in comparison to the benefits, and I will prefer to travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-31 | atulmovie29 | 61 | view |
- The number of car owners is increasing every day because every person expects the freedom to travel and comfort while traveling And that is why most of us want to own a car However owning a car has many good points and limitation as well Write an essay to 84
- Some people work for the same organizations all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- shopping has become a favorite past time for many young people 61
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better to encourage them to spend more time outside playing sports and games Do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization rather than by each individual country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be no vehicles on the road. For example, people working in the IT industry can wo...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...e road. For example, people working in the IT industry can work from home and go to t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56264775414 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.556802892 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496453900709 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7419236687 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299266788014 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963966228863 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063888888852 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187621166188 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354295097498 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.