In order to solve traffic problems, the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the positive and negative effects of such solutions?
Nowadays, traffic congestion has caused great concern to the government. For the sake of solving this problem, a huge from the car owners has been put into efforts to enhance public transports. In line with this, both positive and negative effects and of this solution will be discussed in this essay.
The measure of collecting a great extent of tax conveys a lot of benefits. In this case, the huge tax from private car owners could discourage the purchases of a low-level in families, it also enhances public transport to a large degree. Therefore, people could be encouraged to take public transport more often. According to China Daily, the statistic of a large number about encouraging public transportation shows that with a heavy tax on private car owners, 70% of the private car users are largely affected and those who are still using their own cars tend to be taking public transport.
On the other hand, the negative effects cannot be ignored. The poor will be highly affected, which may lead to small business owners not being able to continue what they are relying on. Thus, it could be considered that solution traffic problems will not make any efforts on them. In addition, for most rich people, they still can afford as many cars as they want, which might not solve the traffic condition at all.
In a nutshell, the double-blade of both positive and negative effects are mentioned above. These to think of are that discourage private car purchases in order to take advantage of public transport as a positive effect; and, might encourage the rich to buy more cars as they need as a negative effect.
- Some people believe that the problem of illegal drugs can be solved by just legalising all drugs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- In order to solve traffic problems, the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the positive and negative effects of such solutions? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87050359712 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54845897248 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3844683977 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29491125515 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982604126106 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541138929211 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177209588087 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438811823174 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.