in order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
what are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Transportation either public or private has been a debatable issue over the years on solving traffic problems by the Authourities. However, government placing high tax on independent car owners to improve public transportation shoulder be considered by some school of thought. This essay will discussed the merits and demerits.
Firstly, specific benefits to instruction of Authority placing tax a private motionable object owners can’t be over emphasized. However, this saves more fuel consumption in purchasing which depicts that such money used for fuel can be diverted into something else. Another benefits to this claim is that it enhances socialization between constant users of general transport and private car owners making use of the transport. Benefit such job creation would be established. This occurs directly proportional to more private owners using the public transport increases more people employed to meet up with demand of users. Other advantage helps to improve roads maintenance, create more routes for accessibility, purchase more buses, increase salaries and more facilities.
Furthermore, the demerits are quite small nut the impact is alarming. When private owner joins the use of public transport, this gives chances for car theft and burglary invasion due to many cars parked at the garage. Other drawbacks highlighted are financial stress on the independent car owner because the tax is huge, although it will be profitable to the government but devastating to the car owners. This does not implies that salaries would be increased neither is the amount declared over the tax is negotiable.
To conclude, either ways on the drawbacks or benefits of such decision, the implementation should be considered and make the tax negotiable due to the impact of the drawback on the decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | SandeshChinchrekar | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | obieda | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | obieda | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-25 | gracespeakss | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-21 | guriibrarr | 50 | view |
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organized and in correct place.What is your opinion about this? 56
- People sleep less than before in many countries. why people sleep less?what effect does it have individually and in society? 67
- You are going away to travel for the summer. A friend will be looking after your house while you are away. Write a letter to your friend.In your letter: Say where you are going Describe your house Explain some of the things your friend must do to 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Other say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...some school of thought. This essay will discussed the merits and demerits. Firstly, sp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imply'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: imply
...tating to the car owners. This does not implies that salaries would be increased neithe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'imply'
Suggestion: imply
...tating to the car owners. This does not implies that salaries would be increased neithe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48581560284 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97349465093 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1883038777 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264675564257 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867494067731 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056540322744 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158913286928 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507387197206 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.