People are using a lot of online language translation applications. Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services
Computer translations for language are getting better and better, where people are indulged in numerous online services. Eventhough there are advantages of knowing the meaning of word or sentence at ease of use and cost, the disadvantages outweigh its benefits by algorithms which not know the word to be translated and differences found in the translated word.
Firstly, advantages of translation applications available in online are user friendly, where it can be easily accessible by all the users in their convinent manner. Moreover, there are most of the applications with free of cost and helpful for persons to use it whenever or wherever needed. For instance: Google translate is one of the effective online platform that performs translation for 1000 words instantly with no amount. Thus the advancement of technology in conversion of languages helps different individuals to easily travel in different places and make basic communications.
Secondly will discuss about the disadvantages where the parallel of each languages differs Syntactically, Structurally and Linguistically in which the online translations confuses itself and don't know what to translate. Furthermore, the phrases of words vary for all languages, in which the computer gives ambiguous meaning of sentence translated based on the keywords or algorithms placed to trace the phrases in the sentences. For example: "I Fancy" is a phrase which means a number of things. " I Fancy a hot chocolate" is a very different to saying " I Fancy my girlfriend". Google translate will do translation if word Fancy literally a Fantasy or Daydream.
Undoubtedly the negative sides of online services are more while comparing with above mentioned paragraph and it is better to avail human guidelines for translation of languages when compared to different application available at online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-13 | Anupama Barooah | 79 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | wjl881219 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | enassar | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | Gurpreet1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Sakthisv | 30 | view |
- Working from home, some think as beneficial and some people think as distract to family. Kindly provide your opinion? 56
- Nowadays the increase amount of garbage is really a concern Why is this happening and what can be done for resolving this 47
- Working from home, some think as beneficial and some people think as distract to family. Kindly provide your opinion? 56
- You saw an advertisement for a skiing course in Canada but you have one or two problems and can’t stay for the whole course.Write a letter to the course director. In your letter• explain your interest in the course• describe your problems• find ou 73
- Many people buy new phones and laptops to keep updated with latest technology. Is it good or bad? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or 1000 words instantly with no amount. Thus the advancement of technology in conver...
^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...online translations confuses itself and dont know what to translate. Furthermore, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56944444444 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26480483602 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9885901075 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225677454384 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082829052402 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570577945016 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148755425683 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460530653386 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.