A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
One of the widely discussed issues nowadays is a person's worth. Now people are beginning to realize that a person’s worth seems to be equivalent to our social status or material possessions. Personally, I tend to think that it is not totally true, and we still may find the old-fashioned values on many people around the world.
Firstly, it is well known that in each society there are many wealthy people with kindness. What I mean here is that these reach people very often donates a lot of money to help others. One of the main reasons behind that is that some of them had come from poor families too, and have earned their money by the very hard work. A good case in point is Mark Zukerberg, that had worked hard to be a one of the richest and youngest man on the planet and with his nowadays status he still helps a many people.
On the other hand, it can also be argued that there are many families that grows even nowadays they children to be honest and kind with others. That is to say gives them their own example in their life. Take for example, the parents that show they children how to be kind and polite with neighborhood children, and how to trust to teachers at school.
In conclusion, taking everything mentioned into account in our final analysis we can say that there are many honest, kind people in the world that we may trust them, and many of the old-fashioned values still are very important for those people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | emilju | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | HarleyDao. | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kushal kushal | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | mary nabil | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Jency Paul | 56 | view |
- Last Wednesday you flew from London to Vancouver. When you arrived home, you discovered that you had left your hand luggage on the plane.Write a letter to the airline. In your letter, you should explain:where and when you lost your bagwhat your bag looks 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, well, for example, i mean, in conclusion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54752851711 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36357590488 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543726235741 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9801452196 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.727272727 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201213575763 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777926676438 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721083037789 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121321737726 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715994930917 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.