A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and
material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust no
longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
These days, the amount of wealth and the number of luxurious items have become the two prime factors to judge a person. The older ways-truthfulness, prestige, and integrity are now being ignored. I undoubtedly agree with this notion as people are now more concerned about money and comforts as well as fascinated by luxuries.
To embark upon, everyone has the desire to possess immense fortune and could cross any limits to acquire it. Due to their this desire, they become attracted to people who are earning enormous income and consider all the actions of these rich people acceptable. Mukesh Ambani, for instance, many people in India unconditionally praise him just because he is the richest man in India, even though his company Reliance has been several times caught committing tax evasion. Money sometimes makes people blind to see the immoral activities which these popular people are performing, and therefore, they treat them correct in all ways.
Moreover, people are now allured towards costly and luxurious possessions such as high-speed cars and high-tech mobile phones. In other words, their fascination with expensive items makes them think that the person who owns the same is following the right path. They start to believe they should also perform similar activities to buy these items. This kind of ideology is eradicating strong principles-honesty, fairness and trustworthiness from society. As a result, well-behaved and honored people are now considered as unsuccessful and backward thinking people.
In conclusion, attraction towards high-value products, and want to have a rich and comfortable life is making people blindly believing that people who already own them are right. Hence, honor and morals are no longer measures of someone's success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission, while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions tomuseums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’tafford.What are the reasons for this behavior?What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?” 84
- Many people buy new phones or laptops to keep up with the latest technology. Is this a good thing or bad thing? 61
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a homewith other old people where there are nurses to look after them.Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or thefamily? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36917562724 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86514697722 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8274816416 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0328697828604 0.244688304435 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0123243114751 0.084324248473 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159439583084 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0248910271393 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227056237087 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.