Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of the land and sea, some think they should be banned.
Do you agree or disagree?
Plastic is the only cheaper and sustainable option for many businesses for decades. As population grows, plastic carry bags proved to be the most environmental polluting option. It is believed that it not only pollute land but also sea, therefore there is a demand for banning plastic bags. I completely agree to the notion that plastic carry bags should be banned for two key reasons: Consumption of the plastic would be harmful in order to sustain planet’s food-chains, Plastic is also non-biodegradable material.
There is no doubt that plastic bags are comfortable option for shoppers to carry goods since ages. Growing world’s population and perpetual usage of plastic bags exacerbate the situations of polluting seashores and landscapes. A lot of mammals, nowadays, consuming plastic bags in the search of foods and thus they are dying. This continue effect would break the living food chain and cause damage to humans in long-haul. For example, Americans government had reckoned aforementioned phenomena where cows are dying in because of consuming plastic bags along with the waste foods. As a result milk production had been reduced drastically and this reaction had affected the Americans human life.
The government immediately posed a ban on plastic bags manufacturers and gradually revived their countrymen from the predicament of the scarcity of milk.
Plastic is also non-biodegradable material which can last on the ground or in the sea for decades. This could be eaten by unconscious sea creature and cause non-curable illness for them.
For example, Australian scientists were the first who had announced that plastic is non-biodegradable material and people should look out for another option for caring shopping items. As they knew, this would not end well if continues for more than several decades. Nowadays, people are witnessing polluted beaches and mountain of plastic bags in metropolitan areas, as plastic is non-degradable material. This also can be the major reason to put immediate ban on plastic bags.
To deduce, either the way plastic should be banned and it needs support from the governments and from the individuals level also. Both the aforementioned aspects severely damage the world environment and so people’s lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | poojary.swetha92@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-21 | niks54 | 67 | view |
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give you own opinion. 73
- The majority of news being reported bad news such as wars famines accidents and crime Why do you think that is Do you think news should be a balance of both good and bad news Give appropriate and relevant examples from your personal experience where you c 69
- Some parents buy and allow their children anything they ask or want. Is this a good way to raise children?What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older? 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of the land and sea, some think they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ernments and from the individuals level also. Both the aforementioned aspects severe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42415730337 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05510943542 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8438881348 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.631578947 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241211996159 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083839305516 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564040111475 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126694054651 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588940518459 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.