Science advanced so much that It can now make it possible for people to live 100 years or even 200. some people think it is a good thing, other think that it is a bad thing. discuss both views and give your opinion
Medical science has increased the life expectancy from the past couple of decades. This achievement has positive consequences as well as negative. I strongly believe that it has resulted in some serious threats to our society.
Science and technology have radically changed the world we live in. They are affecting all aspects of our life and one of the major contributions is in the field of medicine. Advance technology and medicine have tremendously helped in detecting diseases at the early stages and curing them. Consequently, the benefits are in the form of better health and longer life. First and foremost, older people have invaluable experience, know the bigger picture and knowledge of a broader range of subjects that they can understand and solve complicated situation in a couple of minutes. Secondly, they can work for longer years, which will help them to support themselves financially as well as physically. Additionally, this will increase their self- esteem as they will feel useful and make a positive contribution to the community.
On the other hand, this has also posed some serious threats. With time cognitive and analytical skill of human beings deteriorate, they are not fast enough on making a decision, and scared to take risks. Secondly, technology has changed the way corporate world works. If you want to be competitive and take cutting-edge over rival, that could be only achieved by learning new ways. But there is a saying that “you can’t teach old dog new tricks”. Thirdly, each company or business has fix hierarchical structure. If older generation will work after 60, the younger generation would not be hired by companies. This in turn increases stress, anxiety and depression. Companies will suffer too, as youngsters are more energetic, have innovative and creative ideas. In addition to this, they are open to new learning and has hands-on experience of the latest technologies.
In conclusion, I think science achievement in respect of longer life span should be appreciated as this is a major step forward. However, Increased life span will deprive new generation of their rights and this will consequently create a holistic environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | tasnimfahmi | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Param592 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Saira Faiz | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Saira Faiz | 11 | view |
- In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between inequality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in more egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement 78
- Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced.To what extent to you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. 78
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 89
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
.... Thirdly, each company or business has fix hierarchical structure. If older genera...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26420454545 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95346215936 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4622660591 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2272727273 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757342115043 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201850223698 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024051334009 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0450884444759 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167580091823 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.