science will soon make people to live up to 100 or even 200 years. some believe it is a good thing others disagree
discuss both views and give your opinion
As science plays an increasingly more central role in our life. It has been suggested that there will be unprecedented raise in span of lives. Although living for more years is a good sign, I completely disagree with this assertion and more over this is a worrying future that can produce some catastrophic by-products
Even though in today’s era it is difficult to keep-up a healthy lifestyle, it will be completely preposterous not to recognize the value of advancements in scientific technology, especially in the sphere of health. Thanks to it, we are able to operate ultra critical surgeries with microscopic robots. in near future it is possible to live up to 200 year, as a result, we can able see our great grand children and teach them the culture and knowledge we know. There will be more time not only to spend with our loved ones but also to contribute to the society by giving inventions and advice. Hence living almost centuries will have its benefits.
On the contrary, animate for longer time will have some disturbing by-products such as; resource scarcity, over populations, pollution and so on. For instance, if people's lives is increased then there will be need of more resources such as consumables, electricity and power that will affect flora and fauna; furthermore it will be congested to live in this tiny world. One more point worth considering is, pensions and concessions for elders, as there will be a growth in matured people, the government should take necessary steps to give pensions and free health, that will be a stress on the government budget. This approach, in stark contrast, will lead to some devastating results that cannot be turned back.
Despite the fact that, innovations in science and technology on the area of health are at their peak, living longer artificially is debatable. Science should be used to mitigate the problem, not to create a new one. In spite of living an artificial life, in my opinion natural life is good for the society. So I disagree with the argument that, it will be a good thing to live for centuries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | javaduddupudi | 84 | view |
- Nowadays the use of social media such as Facebook, Twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one-on-one conversations in person. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give your opinion and examples from your own 100
- Some people believe that wild birds or animals should be forced out of the city while others think they should be kept in the city Discuss both views and give your own opinion 77
- Some people believe that for a hobby to be enjoyable it should be hard to acquire or learn Do you agree or disagree with this statement 83
- people sleep less than before in many countries why people sleep less what effect does it have individually and in society 80
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier why is this is this the best solution 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As science plays an increasingly more cent...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ical surgeries with microscopic robots. in near future it is possible to live up t...
^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ociety by giving inventions and advice. Hence living almost centuries will have its b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89577464789 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80998587734 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.1518891207 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197275778636 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678909022675 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035151423563 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120390742562 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235855011937 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.