Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree.

Essay topics:

Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree.

We live in era of technological advancement where scientist and technology experts have a pivotal role to play in shaping the future of human society. I totally agree with the notion that in the modern era scientists and technical experts are valued professions as compared to others due to a plethora of reasons. In the below paragraphs I will elucidate my opinion with relevant examples.

Firstly there are myriad of reasons where scientist and technology experts play a key role the most preponderant one is making human lives much simpler and safer. In recent decades with the invention of many life-saving drugs like antibiotics which helped save millions of lives apart from this, it also cured many incurable diseases like tuberculosis, smallpox to name a few. introduction of easier and comfortable transportation means like Aeroplanes, Cars, Bullet Trains have made human transit faster more over kitchen appliances like refrigerator, micro-oven and toasters have added comfort to human lives and reduced the use of manual tools.

Similarly with technology inventions like mobile and satellite phones aid to make communication easier globally. Internet and social media applications like Facebook, google associated with it make it possible for even the underserved areas around the globe to be connected. Since these inventions are critical for the survival of human race thus in the past few decades scientists and technology experts have gained prominence and are of more value as compared to Musicians and Artists

Hence considering the above facts and arguments it can be concluded that human civilization will continue to value scientists and technology experts as they tend to make their life much convenient.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-10 harmankaur 56 view
2019-06-10 harmankaur 61 view
2019-01-22 vinshu koul 61 view
2018-12-14 Farrugh 84 view
2017-05-17 Moushumi Shema 96 view
Essays by user vinshu koul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Introduction
...e tuberculosis, smallpox to name a few. introduction of easier and comfortable transportatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and reduced the use of manual tools. Similarly with technology inventions lik...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... reduced the use of manual tools. Similarly with technology inventions like mobile ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...as compared to Musicians and Artists Hence considering the above facts and argumen...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, similarly, so, thus, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43173431734 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93237460468 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.0009193546 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.555555556 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190636337945 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768168959404 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782348800126 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128827712624 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459373681215 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.