Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree.
In today’s modern society scientific researchers and technology gurus are being greatly valued as compared to people in music and art industry. I strongly agree to this notion because of the importance of science and technology in curtailing threats music industry is facing in the form of plagiarism and copyrights issues. This is the virtue of technology that people rights are saved.
Firstly, it is important to know that music and fine arts have been rejuvenated just because of innovations science brought to it. We are now able to enjoy century old music on the internet –just a click away. For instance, Innovations like latest sound recorders, audio mixers, and audio enhancing applications have refined music to new heights. In addition to that, we have automated search engines available, that can retrieve a decade old piece of music or drama within seconds with all the information related to its genre and production. Such as year, author, writer, producer, actor etcetera.
Secondly, people in professions such as music and arts have greatly benefitted with the modern advent of technology. For, instance YouTube a social entertainment portal is playing a pivotal role in unveiling skills and talents of incumbent young artists and musicians to the world. For instance, Zaid Ali a social media comedian got fame because of his YouTube videos; he has more than 10 Million online subscribers. Another example is Peer Ali Bux a well-known social media folk singer started his journey from Facebook and YouTube.
To sum it up, Scientist and technology experts have transformed landscape of arts and music industry landscape through ground-breaking innovations in technology. People have earned millions and billions by using technology to portray their artistic skills and voice. Musicians and artists are now able to promote their work to a greater and wider demographics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | harmankaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | harmankaur | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | vinshu koul | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | Farrugh | 84 | view |
| 2017-05-17 | Moushumi Shema | 96 | view |
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•Explain why you have moved•Describe the new house•Invite your friend to come and visit 78
- Economic growth and development are usually considered to be beneficial both for individuals and for society as a whole.Do the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 78
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons from your answers and include any relevant examples from your own k 84
- Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree. 84
- Many people say that cooking and eating at home is better for the individual and the family than eating out in restaurants or canteens.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thor, writer, producer, actor etcetera. Secondly, people in professions such as ...
^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'medium'?
Suggestion: medium
...ple is Peer Ali Bux a well-known social media folk singer started his journey from Fa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86740106872 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0424219492 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14020962916 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448944916067 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490720393637 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088515355699 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057782803042 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.