Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Raising a disciplined child is like pulling out your teeth. The handful of people believe that physical punishment is the best way to control their behavior.
This essay will argue why smacking children is the incorrect approach in an attempt to inculcate good habits within them.
On the one hand, parents believe that punishing children for their unacceptable behavior will help them to learn the right manners which will long last in their mind. And, this will refrain them from behaving in the same way for which they got punished. Instead of repeatedly instructing children to be disciplined, they keep ignoring those guidelines and continue with the same behavior, forcing parents to be harsh with them. Many times penalizing physically is an easy and quick method to teach lessons to the youth for their bad behavior. For example, mother smacks the child talking bad words while communicating with others. These instances have shown why parents are in favor of punishing approach to raising the disciplined children.
Despite several arguments provided on how the method of smacking children is a good to raise well-mannered children, I completely disagree with it. Firstly, a child who is often punished physically can grow up an aggressive and impatient adult. Taking out aggression on every small thing becomes its normal behavior. Secondly, they also lack self-confidence and might face serious depression at the early age. Thirdly, children might feel insecure with parents and disrespect elders. Overall, thinking that idea of smacking children is the best approach to discipline is dangerous in itself and may result in raising up aggressive and depressive adults.
In conclusion, this essay argued few reasons why people support smacking children method to raise a disciplined child and how such parenting style can have numerous adverse effects on child's personality. In my opinion, it is an entirely unacceptable method to teach discipline to children.
- Some universities offer online courses for students. Do you think this is a positive or negative development for students? 84
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 68
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view. 93
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78254603896 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7891871146 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1176470588 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116196451487 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411455652725 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390120604304 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721729845436 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267206770238 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.