Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technology has brought in a radical change in how people are connecting with each other. It has changed the way we interact not only with colleagues, business associates, close friends, but also with our immediate family members. Even though technology is a poor substitute for personal interaction, we cannot deny a valuable and positive role it plays in today's progressive world.
With globalization, businesses are scattered in numerous countries with an intent to capture local as well as global market. Such moto has raised the need to connect with business contacts round the clock regardless of physical miles at the touch of a button. The internet-based communication tools such as video calling, telephone conferencing are utilized to a great extent for a face-to-face conference, reducing travel cost needed for in-person meetings. This move is financially prolific to an employer. In other words, an extensive usage of the web-based communication tools has changed the way people are interacting professionally.
Technology also changed the way we keep in touch with personal contacts regardless of time zone or country. We are always updated on what activities our friends have been doing by seeing posts on social media such as Facebook, Instagram. Also, with the change in family fabric, even if close family migrates to another country, the internet-based applications provided us a platform for communicating with the family members. It means distance is no longer a barrier to retain strong family connections. Moreover, teenagers chat with strangers, long-distance relationship, expanding social networking are few examples which explain that almost all types of relationships at the individual front are affected by technology.
To conclude, the advancements in communication technology shows the positive change in professional and personal life by making the world as a global village wherein everyone can interact at ease using plenty of communication tools available in the market.
- Some people say success in a person's life as an adult is the result of the way he was brought up by his parents. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say International sports events help in world peace. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Development in technology make our life complex, and we should try to simplify our life and stay away from these development. To what extend do you agree? 96
- Some people support agricultural developments, such as factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, such as, as well as, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56026058632 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21165040115 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5985347789 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.928571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26857111813 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906277240839 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810539410449 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156350814061 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562798764054 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.