School are spending more time teaching subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extend do you agree and disagree.
Putting more emphasis on learning mainstream subjects is the traditional method incorporated into a school curriculum, whereas another view suggests focusing on teaching soft skills that can help students search a job quickly. Personally, I believe that knowledge of core subjects and other skill sets are equally important in the process of searching a job opportunity and hence, it is recommended to have equal time distribution for both.
Learning core subjects such as history create a platform for students to know numerous aspects of past life. Students are made aware of historical events and decisions made in particular circumstances by famous personalities. Knowing these facts together help the young to relate the impact of activities occurred in past on our present and to analyze what went wrong and how things could have been made better. As a result, students are in a better position to take decision or action under a known situation from such learning.
On the other hand, skills such as interpersonal, presentation, managerial and leadership play a vital role while interacting with others and creating a positive impression during a job interview process. One of the biggest thing students develop by learning these skills is self-confidence, which is the best quality one can have to win any deal. In other words, gaining skills help us in climbing the ladder of a shining professional career.
I believe, in today's fiercely competitive world, there is need to enhance special skills as qualification alone won't help students to excel. Successful education, that includes inculcating long-term skills as well as teaching other subjects, is making students capable to get a job the day they are out of the universities.
In conclusion, holistic learning is the need of the hour in our present educational system and students must be taught mainstream subjects along with other skills that can help them search a job as per their interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-24 | Tina1312 | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Tina1312 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | Jasmineeee | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | A VATSAL KUMAR | 42 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Shimaa | 61 | view |
- Some people support agricultural developments, such as factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people say it is OK to use animals for our benefit others say it is not good to exploit them Discuss both points of view and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 68
- School are spending more time teaching subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extend do you agree and disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to core'
Suggestion: to core
...time distribution for both. Learning core subjects such as history create a platf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26031746032 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98895927557 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593650793651 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4257636149 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231614693131 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787922534547 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499459342264 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125093685399 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501160234729 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.