Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although schools are investing time in teaching traditional subjects, there are few individuals who opine that they should teach more subjects which help in securing a job. This essay will explain why I agree with the opinion of teaching traditional subjects while I disagree that it should be dominated by subjects which help in landing a job.
Considering firstly the merits of learning traditional subjects for a student in school, an important one to consider is that they enhance the knowledge about past. This is important because a child needs to know about the historical events and contributions made to the society in terms of current culture. For instance, for students of Germany, if they do not study about unification of Germany through history and the battles previous generation citizens have fought, then the pride of being a German will not be alive for the future generations. As a result, the history of a country will remain in shelves of an old library, but not in the hearts of people.
However, I disagree with the idea that they should spend more time developing skills to secure a job. This is because students in school are meant to be exposed to various streams of life such as science, social, mathematics, and other subjects. On their own interest they will choose their career path and for this the school curriculum must not be one dimensional by just teaching subjects which provides employment. To illustrate, if a student is forced to study to work in an Information Technology company, then the zeal to work does not exists. As a result, the quality of workers in the organizations will drop substantially.
In conclusion, from my perspective, teaching subjects like arts and history will improve the knowledge about past events in the world, whereas, other core subjects should be taught, but must be the choice of students.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-03-24 | Tina1312 | 61 | view |
2020-03-24 | Tina1312 | 56 | view |
2019-05-29 | Jasmineeee | 67 | view |
2019-05-09 | A VATSAL KUMAR | 42 | view |
2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 84
- Having a good university degree guarantees people a good job To what extent do you agree 77
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 42
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 11
- Hobbies need to be difficult to make them interesting.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exist'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: exist
...company, then the zeal to work does not exists. As a result, the quality of workers in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
...company, then the zeal to work does not exists. As a result, the quality of workers in...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99679487179 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7875974936 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0368374836 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280012559418 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106047874727 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117714156931 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179020251899 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117030584723 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.