Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, using cigarettes is considered to be a chief factor of illness and death rates across the globe. Many claim that, in the favor of the public health, it is governments’ responsibility to impose a ban on tobacco products usage. I, for one, entirely agree with the given statement on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, smokers put a heavy burden on the public health system. First and foremost, having detrimental effects on body, these plague products ruin the lungs, as well as other organs. Therefore, more and more smokers will have to visit hospitals and occupy beds and nurses, which clearly puts more pressure on them. Second, smoking is not only harmful to themselves, but also to the people around them. These so-called passive smokers are said to face quite the same negative effects, aking to the real smokers. Take stadiums or parks as an example; they entail many individuals using cigarettes, which is not acceptable per se. Thus, they give rise to many irreversible physical repercussions to the public, and in turn, create difficult circumstances for the public health.
Additionally, availability can be a deciding factor (a causative factor) in this respect. In fact, the more tobacco products are there to be consumed, the more people, especially the youngsters, are prone to falling prey to cigarettes and even drugs. Here, there might be some groups who would contend that people should have free will to decide for themselves. I, however, think that these people who choose to smoke, should be required to pay more taxed, or even be forced to pay their treatment costs. Governments here have done the right thing to engrave the ‘government health warning’ label, but it seems this action has not been enough. As a result, imposing heavy constraints on these products might be a progressive step.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that governments and legislators should be tough on this matter, as it harms society as a whole. Put large tax constraints and prohibiting smoking in most places seem to be the correct way to lessen its damaging effects.
- Some people believe that having sport in schools is a waste of time and resources whilst other people believe that sport is a vital part of education Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In the future robots may do more of the work that is done by humans today Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Song People say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really don t need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with it 67
- Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meat can cause serious health problems Do you agree or disagree 73
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...lness and death rates across the globe. Many claim that, in the favor of the public health...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...only harmful to themselves, but also to the people around them. These so-called passive smokers are sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03724928367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76434957233 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601719197708 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.963256338 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167560307238 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511003316765 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477430701769 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10728645002 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563961082059 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.