In this age of information and communication, social media is indispensable to life. Social media which originally created to serve as a connection platform between people, has further developed into a multi-function platform. One of the addition role of those platforms is as an information provider, current events, commentaries, fashion, lifestyle and technology etc, all sort of ideas you want could be found on social media platform which even perform better than those tradition information providers, newspapers and radios.
Another amazing function of social media platform makes it becomes dominant channel for idea sharing, it is the “like” giving mechanism. This mechanism not only allow users to easily express themselves, simply click the like or dislike button, but also spread your view within your network. User can further share the link which they like, agree and believe.
With the numerous advantage, it goes without saying that social media conquer everyone’s daily live in just a short period. However, social media is a two-blade sword, it also has dark sides. Social media aggravate the degree of information explosion. The easy “like and share” function encourage users to share all they get from the platform, even they actually not read the content. This behaviour breeds clickbait and content farm media, leads to a rocket rise of incorrect and even fake information circulate in the platforms. The huge amount of materials show up in the platform every day, no one could have enough time and energy to verify every single passage but customarily forward by an inadvertent fingertip movement. The ease of information flow and sharing become the accomplice of spreading rumours, result of Brexit vote in UK is the well-known victim.
Although we cannot eliminate fake information appears in social media but we can stop its spread. The best way is to adjust our behaviour on using social media: do fact check before you give a like or forward to a message. Furthermore, there is mechanism to report incorrect or misleading message in all social media platform, wisely use this function could help to build up a healthy and positive environment for information flow. In conclusion, social media bears fruitful development in connecting people all over the world but we should alert the risk of disseminate lies.
- You want to sell your television You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you Write a letter to your friend In your letter explainWhy you are selling the televisionDescribe the televisionSuggest a date when your friend can come and see it 73
- Social media has many positive uses, but there have been some negative consequences to it as well. Identify a problem caused by social media and describe the solutions you would propose to address this problem. 89
- A friends of yours is thinking about applying for the same course that you did at university He she has asked for your advice about studying this subject Write a letter to your friend In your letter Give details of the course you took at the university Ex 89
- Social media has many positive uses, but there have been some negative consequences to it as well. Identify a problem caused by social media and describe the solutions you would propose to address this problem. 89
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter 1 Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job 2 Say what else you c 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tradition' or 'those traditions'?
Suggestion: this tradition; those traditions
...platform which even perform better than those tradition information providers, newspapers and r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33066666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89354837911 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610666666667 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0164634789 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.588235294 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222379590027 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868278272657 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057135344137 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143175653064 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486660244244 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.