Some argue that it is the responsibility of the parents to teach children about healthy eating habits, whereas others believe that teachers should be responsible for teaching their students how to eat in a healthy way.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Eating habits play a vital role in the proper nourishment of persons physical and mental health. With the increasing percentage of an obese population, it is evident that education imparting healthy benefits from proper food intake has become vital. However, some people view this as a responsibility of parents, whereas others state this as a teacher's job for inculcating proper education. Both views are expressed in this essay.
Children spend majority of their time with their parents, most of their habits are developed at home. To illustrate, parents who prefer eating home-cooked meals and pursue fresh fruits and vegetables in majority of their diet, pupils will passionately follow the healthy protocols, moreover, in India majority of families are vegetarians based on their family backgrounds. Subsequently, if parents are depended on outside food or meals, children will find it challenging to shift to home-cooked meals in future. Thus parenting shapes the eating habits of a child.
Additionally, pupils spend significant time in schools, learning basic skills and knowledge necessary for survival. Many schools have their meal programmes to retain their eating habits and teach them the benefits. Furthermore, the personal development lectures are made compulsory in the curriculum, where students are taught about the advantages and disadvantages of the foods and why proper nourishments are required to avoid causing detrimental effects to their body in life long-run.
To sum up, both parents and teachers play a crucial role in defining the pupils' eating habits; thus, it is significantly essential to rectify the habits at the right age to have a better lifestyle in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-04 | parabshreyas | 61 | view |
| 2017-01-31 | muhammadali_31 | 77 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning a practical skill Do you agree or disagree 84
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree Discuss both the views an 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 89
- There are many things that can motivate people to perform well in their work These can include the salary job satisfaction or the chance to help others What do you feel is the best motivation to do well at work Give reasons for your answer and include any 92
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shifting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: shifting
...meals children will find it challenging to shift to homecooked meals in future Thus pare...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... shapes the eating habits of a child Additionally pupils spend significant time in school...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8269251792 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 264.0 20.2975951904 1301% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1412.0 106.682146367 1324% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 264.0 20.7667163134 1271% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 64.0 7.06120827912 906% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297211714356 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.297211714356 0.084324248473 352% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157628434577 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277041179675 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 135.8 13.0946893788 1037% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.94 50.2224549098 -408% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.4 11.3001002004 950% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.23 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.58 8.58950901804 251% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 107.6 10.1190380762 1063% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 108.0 10.7795591182 1002% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shifting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: shifting
...meals children will find it challenging to shift to homecooked meals in future Thus pare...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... shapes the eating habits of a child Additionally pupils spend significant time in school...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8269251792 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 264.0 20.2975951904 1301% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1412.0 106.682146367 1324% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 264.0 20.7667163134 1271% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 64.0 7.06120827912 906% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297211714356 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.297211714356 0.084324248473 352% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157628434577 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277041179675 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 135.8 13.0946893788 1037% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.94 50.2224549098 -408% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.4 11.3001002004 950% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.23 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.58 8.58950901804 251% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 107.6 10.1190380762 1063% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 108.0 10.7795591182 1002% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.