Some believe that more academic subjects, such as chemistry, physics and history, should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is agreed among the masses that child education is very important, however what subject he or she should chose for a prosperous future has been a under debate for many years. Some believe that in early years of education more academic course like chemistry, physics and history should be incorporated in the syllabus. On the other hand some believe child with benefit from studying practical courses such as motor mechanics and cooking. However, I completely disagree with second opinion.
Admittedly, subject like chemistry, physics and history some student might fine it boring and difficult to grasp. But if we look around our world in full of application which are the result of chemistry, physics and history. For instance telecommunication, which is an application of physics. Without a doubt t it has created huge number new opportunities for people. On other hand chemistry has great contribution in every aspect of our life from building material, medicine, sport and metals etc. Finally, studying history plays a major role in developing our society. It helps student understand role, importance and impact of our ancestor on today’s world.
However, on the other hand more practical courses like motor mechanic and cooking will develop a trade specific skill, which in fact will help him get a job but will also limit his/her options. In other words student enrolled in motor mechanic course will be able to learn about motor mechanic and student enrolled in cooking classes will only learn how to cook, on the other hand academic course like physics, chemistry and history has wider application in our daily life. Therefore, a student has a wider range of application to select from his/her area of interest.
I will conclude with my perspective that in school more academic subjects should be taught.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-31 | muhammadali_31 | 73 | view |
- Some believe that more academic subjects, such as chemistry, physics and history, should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 73
- Some children receive almost no encouragement from their parents regarding their performance at school, while other children receive too much pressure from their over enthusiastic parents which can have a negative impact on the child.Why do you think some 82
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some argue that it is the responsibility of the parents to teach children about healthy eating habits, whereas others believe that teachers should be responsible for teaching their students how to eat in a healthy way. Discuss both views and give your own 73
- Although more and more people read the news on internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... chose for a prosperous future has been a under debate for many years. Some belie...
^
Line 2, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of our ancestor on today's world. However, on the other hand more practica...
^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'words'' or 'word's'?
Suggestion: words'; word's
...ll also limit his/her options. In other words student enrolled in motor mechanic cour...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72436973985 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0817737013 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325014486417 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991461705939 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108089628703 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196210550197 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722678137048 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.