Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions.
The basic phenomenon for any business success is teamwork. Unfortunately, these days it is hard for businesses to find resources who have basic professional ethics such as cooperative behavior and teamwork. there are certain evident reasons for this dilemma and I shall be suggesting some rational solutions in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there are enormous causes of people lacking cooperative skills; few being evident such as lack of leadership, lack of common goals, concentrated on individual key performance indicators, and last but not the least is working in isolations. All these factors are the waterfall effects of non-cooperative behavior of employees. I had a personal experience of a project disaster in which owing to individual kpis; resources did not pay attention to the main project goal and project failed in the last stage.
In order to mitigate the aforementioned issues and bring cooperative culture in the organization, there are certain proactive measures that top management needs to take. First and the foremost is the implementation of share kpis among cross-functional team members assigned on a certain the project, in order to ensure that the company meets the project objective at the end. Moreover, soft skills training needs to be made mandatory for all the new inductions in order to adapt the organization's culture. Lastly, celebrate wins as a team instead of giving credit to an individual resource only, this would certainly boost the morale of all team members and strengthen the bonding.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, I reinstate that a good working culture paves the way for a successful business that has an essential element called a cooperative environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | Kubraguran | 73 | view |
2020-01-15 | Wajeeha Umer | 73 | view |
2019-09-29 | syedaali | 56 | view |
2019-09-23 | ShahnumZ | 78 | view |
2019-08-21 | nirav9971 | 73 | view |
- Television dominates the free-time of too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 61
- Inventors are not as important to society as doctors.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- Nowadays many people working from home Some think it is beneficial to the employee others think it may distract the family routine What is my opinion 95
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...h as cooperative behavior and teamwork. there are certain evident reasons for this di...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... solutions in the following paragraphs. To begin with, there are enormous causes...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, moreover, so, then, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41328413284 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21056537304 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0249463366 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183715142448 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064762552181 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595594269912 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101881266309 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562353476053 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.