SOME CELEBRITIES SAT THAT THEIR PRIVATE LIVES SHOULD NOT COME UNDER MEDIA SCRUTINY OTHER PEOPLE HOWEVER BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS PART OF THEIR FAME Discuss both views and give your opinion

Although, many people believe that media should publicize celebrities private lives is a good converging, I think in a reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. My inclination is justified in the following paragraph.

Out of all the arguments, the strongest one to prove my some celebrities like it to comes into the media frequently, and it is the more impact on individual life. In addition, Technology has the Revolution into the media, however the media do more interfere into the celebs private lives. Another else, I think lot of pressure on the celebrity about movies and they are very fatigue from your own working. Agood example for this is many times the media is overly intrusive such as, the make news about the affair with some one person and that news infiltration.

On the contrary, some people counter claim the mentioned the support. The foremost argument they do is being a role model to many people of the society and the celebrity have a huge impact on the population. They have thousands of fan following and people believes role models to them. In add, celebrities are many bad habits such a cigarette, liquor and so on which young people to follow them and go to wrong away.

In conclude, some famous and successful people should balance their personal and professional life is a large crowd is directly or indirectly observing and following the. Moreover the technology Revolution make them more famous and vulnerable as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reverse manner" with adverb for "reverse"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ate lives is a good converging, I think in a reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. M...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verging, I think in a reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. My incl...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al life. In addition, Technology has the Revolution into the media, however the m...
^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vate lives. Another else, I think lot of pressure on the celebrity about movies a...
^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the media is overly intrusive such as, the make news about the affair with some...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...They have thousands of fan following and people believes role models to them. In...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds of fan following and people believes role models to them. In add, celebrities...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...y or indirectly observing and following the. Moreover the technology Revolution make...
^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...indirectly observing and following the. Moreover the technology Revolution make them mor...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, i think, in addition, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95141700405 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70077812764 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4651745213 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243462085974 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796193387432 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558601181292 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137636657746 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257844370317 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.