SOME CELEBRITIES SAT THAT THEIR PRIVATE LIVES SHOULD NOT COME UNDER MEDIA SCRUTINY. OTHER PEOPLE, HOWEVER, BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS PART OF THEIR FAME.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Few individuals in our society, who work dedicatedly and diligently, somewhere achieve the status of success and become big-gun or big nose of their professional field. Their popularity grows by leaps and bounds. Social media also give enough attention to make them the celebrity of our society.
These famous personalities serve as role models for the youth of the nation, they try to emulate the professional formula and many other trails of these celebrities. Therefore, the social media, knowing the fact (of the strength of fan following of these famous people) always give extra attention. Many a time, these famous individuals were seen avoiding to media personnel, as every now and then, a plethora of news channels broadcast the gossips of their family life, vacations, dressing style and on many other topics. Which seems to be direct infiltration or invading into their personal life. I strongly believe and supreme court justice of India also advocate that privacy is the human right, and nobody should infiltrate in others’ personal matter whether they are a celebrity or common man.
On the contrary, being a role model to many people of the society, these celebrities have a huge impact on the population. Their success lures a thousand of individuals and motivates them for their personal/professional goals. Many people think that it is their success and fan following, which makes their personal life susceptible and prone to media attention. The longer in social media, the longer will be the longevity of celebrity status. Many renowned persons are well aware of these facts, and they behave very decently and elegantly to give a positive message to the public. These celebrities have sacrificed their personal life to accept the celebrity brand.
In a nutshell, I think that these famous and successful people should balance their professional and personal life as a large crowd is directly or indirectly observing and following them. Moreover, the technology revolutions make them more famous and vulnerable as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-28 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
- SOME CELEBRITIES SAT THAT THEIR PRIVATE LIVES SHOULD NOT COME UNDER MEDIA SCRUTINY OTHER PEOPLE HOWEVER BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS PART OF THEIR FAME Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT CHILDREN SHOULD RECEIVE FORMAL TRAINING AT SCHOOL AT HOW TO BE GOOD PARENTS IN THE FUTURE DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...re seen avoiding to media personnel, as every now and then, a plethora of news channels broadcast ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it is their success and fan following, which makes their personal life suscepti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, i think, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29051987768 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86221215399 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3785668712 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197007012295 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740314375617 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403522757972 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122702037075 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378588786908 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.