In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
It is impossible to imagine our life without transport in cities. However, it is said that the traffic capacity is almost exceeded. This essay will consider what cause this overload and suggest some feasible steps to tackle this problem.
The first reason is that urban areas often have a poor design of roads. Initially cities and their infrastructure were planned to accommodate a limited of people, but now with the growth of population cities cannot deal with extra pressure on the traffic capacity. The second cause of the problem with heavy traffic is a growing number of cars. Modern life with its hectic lifestyle usually forces people to purchase cars so that they can either arrive at work on time or drop their children, for example, at school. The last reason is that public transport is insufficient in number and quality to meet the needs of citizens. Many people prefer to take a drive in personal cars instead of buses because public transportation is often of low-quality and dissatisfy all needs.
A possible solution to the problem with growing number of cars on the roads is to redesign existing highways. City authorities can both widen narrow roads and construct new branches in street where it is impossible to change the bandwidth. Another way to deal with this problem is to raise taxes on vehicles. Once the government increases taxation on personal transport, the number of car purchases will decline and, therefore, roads will become free of cars to some extent. On top of that, municipal transportation can rise in number and quality. People would change their preferences and choose buses instead if the number of buses, for instance, were more in quantity and had better interior. Therefore, the government should subsidize this industry and make standards for public transport operators tighter.
In conclusion, there are many factors, mainly relating to the poor architecture of roads and public transport, that increase the traffic load in cities, but it is possible to solve this issue mostly by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | ishpinder45 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Prashanth Maturi | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | Tolik | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | Tolik | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
- With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.To what extent do you agree? 67
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than on building a large collection of paper books.To what extent do you agree? 73
- You have heard that a developer plans to build a shopping centre near your home Write a letter to the council In your letter say how you heard about the plan explain how you feel about it ask for more information about it 81
- Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astructure were planned to accommodate a limited of people, but now with the grow...
^^
Line 4, column 563, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: insufficient
...last reason is that public transport is insufficient in number and quality to meet the needs of citize...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11275964392 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67783727243 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554896142433 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.388087601 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.352941176 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211153440438 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662551844364 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085321980301 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145165833407 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816536832753 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.