Recent years there are discussions about city planning. Some suggest that the housing area can be increased by building more taller constructions, while others believe building individual houses on a wider and larger land. In my opinion, I am convinced that constructing houses is a better and suitable way under economical and physical circumstances.
By building houses in a broader district, the population density will become much lower. The average residential area per person could be significantly increased. The cost of living will then be reduced. Residents can save more money because of reduced rent and cheaper food. They can spend it somewhere else, like personal entertainment and travelling. As a result, their quality of life will be raised.
Individuals may argue that living in a wider and further district could lead to longer commute time and safety issues. I believe it is just partly true. With further and complete development of certain region, businesses like banks and supermarket will set up different branches there. People living there will not require travelling around the city again. Regarding security issues, it can be solved by redistribution of police forces. It will not cause any serious problem.
In summary, although there may be some short-term drawbacks to set up residential zone on a wider location, its long-term benefits do worth it.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 89
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'taller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: taller
...using area can be increased by building more taller constructions while others believe buil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er economical and physical circumstances By building houses in a broader district...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult their quality of life will be raised Individuals may argue that living in a w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, then, while, in summary, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21917808219 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81717027606 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 219.0 20.2975951904 1079% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1143.0 106.682146367 1071% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 219.0 20.7667163134 1055% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 80.0 7.06120827912 1133% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228018485232 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228018485232 0.084324248473 270% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14193470244 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156399685957 0.056905535591 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 112.7 13.0946893788 861% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -159.27 50.2224549098 -317% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 89.9 11.3001002004 796% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.48 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.11 8.58950901804 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 89.6 10.1190380762 885% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 90.0 10.7795591182 835% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.