It is a controversial topic whether urban areas should be expanded horizontally or vertically. However, from my perspective, the comparison between two solutions is irrelevant as the choice mainly relies on the conditions and needs of a specific region.
The major reason for the development of cities vertically is its space-saving. Apparently, the metropolis usually has an overcrowded population which increases the housing demand over the residents. Thus, vertical housing expansion is a feasible solution to this dilemma with various benefits, especially in countries of land scarcity. This solution not only saves land funds for more crucial public constructions but also accommodates numerous citizens. For instance, by planning cities with sky-scraping apartments and buildings, Singapore, whose land area is significantly small, has solved the massive problem and developed into a nation with a huge population density. Moreover, because of living in sharing areas, the price for accommodations is likely to be budget-friendly. Thanks to its reasonable cost, it is clearly offered for low-income and mid-income opportunities to live in housing of average or higher quality.
On the other hand, the method of expanding cities horizontally also has its own advantages for the proper areas. This method is most suitable for areas that have abundant resources, spacious land funds as well as low population density. Therefore, the main reason to be mentioned is the sense of comfort brought from the bigger private space of detached houses compared to apartments or high-rise buildings. Because of sharing living areas, people living in skyward buildings usually do indoor activities while the low-rise buildings give them spaces for their outdoor activities. In addition, one of the priority targets of city planning is the guarantee of people's safety, especially areas with high incidence of natural disasters, in order to minimize the loss of human and property
To sum up, whether urban areas should be expanded horizontally or vertically is still a controversial topic. In my opinion, sooner or later, expansion in both vertical and horizontal ways will be a trend as a method for their holistic development.
- The plans below show a science park in 2008 and the same science park today 2021 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below 89
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a vertical way" with adverb for "vertical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...or reason for the development of cities in a vertical way is its space-saving. Apparently, the me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...lic constructions but also accommodates a large number of citizens. For instance, by planning its...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45132743363 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10675631606 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3077658255 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1333333333 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172145807279 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054075716171 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368937360163 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936976983302 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510757061917 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.