In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Junk food considerably affects our ecosystem. Intake of excessive fast foods influence various discomfort for our well-being and moreover causes harmful effects on the environment. In this essay, whether it is mandatory to introduce higher tax rates on unhealthy foods will be discussed.
Fast foods are unhygienic to children in many possible ways. Firstly, it contains plenty of fat, sugar, and salt which causes obesity, emotional and self-esteemed problems. Besides that, it causes chronic illness in the later part of their life. Secondly, it has low nutrients; however, Children needed high proteins, vitamins, and minerals for their bones and physical strength. Moreover, children perform very poor academics because of poor concentration levels. Furthermore, they have less energy to involve in sports activities. Additionally, Fast foods cause harmful effects on adults such as Obesity, Cardiovascular diseases, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, high blood sugar and so on.
Polluting our environment is one of the major issues. Junk foods carry bags, beverage cups and straws were made out of plastics. The result is that they were dumped into our surrounding soil and in the sea, as a result, harmful chemicals from plastic were released and ended up in groundwater. While Marine life which depends on jellyfishes mistakenly consume plastics. Besides, seabirds mistook floating plastics on ocean surface as plastics.
Contrary to affecting health and polluting environment, Junk foods were convenient in many ways. The first main reason is the relatively low price. Secondly, any time (24 hours) which makes buzzing cities and urban life comfortable. Thirdly, saves plenty of time (cooking time consuming). And finally, can find anywhere (at the corner of each street).
In summary, Fast foods were more suitable for the fast-moving world. On the contrary, it affects our health and polluting the environment which is more serious compared to the comfortability we gain. Hence, the government should increase tax rates as well as stop marketing such unhealthy foods.
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think is a good thing? 11
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community Write a letter to the newspaper editor In your letter suggest someone you think should receive the award describe what the person does to help the community suggest an awar 95
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on unhealthy foods will be discussed. Fast foods are unhygienic to children in...
^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e released and ended up in groundwater. While Marine life which depends on jellyfishe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55485893417 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8492693978 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630094043887 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6388878572 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0434782609 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8695652174 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21739130435 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160984646121 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413448602713 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484009530261 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926832331928 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520844558146 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.