In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education with a range of subjects. In others, it has a narrow range of specific subjects so students can focus on their future career. What system is more appropriate in today’s world?
It is true that in some nations, an educational program includes variety of different subjects, while in others a college program concentrates on specialized courses related to a student’s future profession. In my opinion, a program covering a broad range of topics is more suitable for modern requirements.
First, college students have to explore diversity of science and art in order to be able to do adequate choice of their future path as professionals. Probably their perception will change in the course of educational process. For instance, I always was keen in precise subjects as mathematics, but later I realized than I am fond of dancing. Thus, school should help children to unleash their true potential and lead them to becoming the best person they could be.
In contrast to it, those curriculums, which are focused on specific subjects with emphasizing on a certain pursuit, may help to receive deeper knowledge in some field, however it miss everything lying beyond the priorities. As a result, children lose the chance to bring to light talents, which were not discovered previously. Meanwhile, secondary school should not sacrifice them for the sake of limited range of knowledge because modern people live in a highly competitive world and information is everything. In addition, flexibility and ability to change the field of work is crucial for the survival in a modern life.
In conclusion, even though narrow subject system may be useful in some cases, I believe that the present world needs more broaden range disciplines to be studded in college because it aides in children’s development and reliving their true potential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | ChaeWonKim | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
- Nowadays young people know less about traditions and culture than in the past What are the reasons for it Is this a positive or negative development 65
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- You eat at your favourite restaurant every day for lunch You do not like the decor they have chosen Write the manager a letter telling him What you think is great about the restaurant What things you think need to be changed Suggestions on ways to improve 56
- Some people think that big international sporting events are not worthwhile for the host country Do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think hosting an international sporting event is beneficial for a country while others disagree advantages disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more suitable for modern requirements. First, college students have to explore ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...of educational process. For instance, I always was keen in precise subjects as mathematics...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'misses'?
Suggestion: misses
...per knowledge in some field, however it miss everything lying beyond the priorities....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25842696629 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01411809823 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8031252778 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.636363636 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.2727272727 7.06120827912 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245787841216 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735119351619 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532647570873 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13693581187 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330052382838 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.