Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the
company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for
some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In times of high unemployment, employers need to do very little to encourage their
staff to work hard, but when job vacancies are scares, they have to find effective
ways of rewarding their staff to stop them from going elsewhere.
One obvious way of doing this is to offer extra money to employees who are seen to
be working exceptionally hard and this is done in companies with a product to sell.
For example, real estate agents or department stores can offer a simple commission
on all sales.
This style of management favors people who can demonstrate their contribution
through sales figures, but does not take into account the work done by people
behind the scenes who little contact with the public. A better approach is for
management to offer a bonus to all the staff at the end of year if the profits are
healthy. This, however, does not allow management to target individuals who have
genuinely worked harder than others.
Another possibility is to identify excellent staff through incentive schemes such as
'Employee of the Month' or 'Worker of the Week' to make people feel recognized.
Such people are usually singled out with the help of clients. Hotels, restaurants and
tour operators may also allow staff to accept tips offered by clients who are pleased
with the service. However, tipping is a highly unreliable source of money and does
not favor everyone.
Basically, employees want to be recognized for their contribution - whether through
receiving more money or simply some encouraging words. They also need to feel
that their contribution to the whole organization is worthwhile. Good management
recognizes this need and responds appropriately.
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management ef 78
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for poverty What can we do to help the poor 61
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour Write a letter to your neighbour In your letter introduce yourself describe your plans for the party invite your neighbor to com 56
- Nowadays there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past Some people think this situation has cause more problems than it has solved What are your opinions on this 56
- Whenever towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22545454545 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76557997122 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9643105197 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.538461538 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281452239747 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874448902182 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448358326767 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734076091475 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529994041906 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.