Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
Modern business often requires entrepreneurs and their workers to take action in order for them to succeed in the market. One of the measures is for organizations to oblige personnel to stay in contact with managers constantly, in spite of their being on well-deserved leave. This essay will discuss both positive and negative sides of this measure and agrees with the opinion that the benefits outstrip the drawbacks.
To begin with, a stable workflow is one of the main merits. It often happens that the team stays inactive because its leaders are on holiday. However, if they were available to the team members, this team would work as usual, and many deadlines would not be exceeded. Another benefit of demanding employees fully availability is extra money to the staff payment. As a compensation for the ruined holiday, workers have the right to demand a greater wage. This money go to pay either mortgages or cover the vacation expenses. The last advantage is immediate immersion into work after holiday. As they are fully aware of company problems, employees will be able to easily return to their duties with no need to take a time to catch up with current tasks.
Despite the pluses, uninterrupted communication between supervisors and workers has some drawbacks. First of all, annoying phone calls from office often lead to frequent disruptions from relaxation. Instead of enjoying a long-awaited rest from occupation, vacationers would have to work on the phone and laptop. Another disadvantage of this innovation at work is growing stress. Employers often suffer from various stress-related diseases when they work with no time for recreation. The last negative side of stay in touch with the boss is that the company would face higher staff turnover. Workers are prone to resigning until they are provided with traditional vacation.
Even though some subordinates crave for ordinary holiday, both sides may take many benefits from this work organization. As for companies, they will become leaders in their market by providing high quality services on time. For the staff, they will have a chance to ask for a larger salary. On top of that, staying fully in touch with employees will contribute to a strong rapport in the company.
In conclusion, it is clear that the benefits outweigh the demerits. Regardless some problems, employees will help their companies become stronger in the highly competitive market as well as pay their debts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | vaishali saral | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | vaishali saral | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Tolik | 73 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Is virtual reality more than just for fun 87
- Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive fundings from the government in order for them to continue with their work.To what extent do you agree 73
- These days people are living into their 90s and beyond. As a result, there is increasing concern about care for the elderly. Do you think it is the responsibility of the family to care for their elderly members or should the government be held responsible 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, well, as for, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in spite of, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14463840399 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76223237158 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543640897756 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3960091093 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9583333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149551728198 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397885678898 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273986519672 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856037867145 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120897039442 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.