Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
A number of authorities think that it is more favorable for pupils to begin studying jargon at primary school instead of secondary school. This essay will argue that the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks. This essay will first demonstrate that learning an early additional jargon improves speaking and brings cognitive benefits, followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely confusion with their native tongue is not valid.
The main reason behind starting young ones teaching foreign dialect is to achieve fluency. They will have more time to practice their skills, which help them to gain more knowledge about that particular dialect and become professional speakers. For example, in some countries such as Norway and Holland, where English is taught from a very young age, and more than 95% of people speak it at an advanced level. Learning another language also improves logical thinking and brain activities. In other words, it benefits the overall mental growth. A recent study has shown that the children who studied a new speech before the age of 5 are significantly more likely to get a higher score in Mathematics.
People who opposed that learning another style at an early age causes the child to become perplexed with their mother tongue. However, there is actually no evidence to support this view, and children from bilingual parents might do well in both languages. A recent survey has shown that growing buds having bilingual family backgrounds sometimes outperform their peers.
On balance, the fact that early grasping international languages skills lead to higher fluency and improve mental development clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it interferes with native language skills.
- Recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by around fifty percent over the last fifty years What can we do to help protect the wildlife around the world 78
- Some people believe that cooking at home is a waste of time They feel it is better to buy fast food which is more convenient and less stressful in modern life Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 67
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it what are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it what are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, second, so, well, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34181818182 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61154714918 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654545454545 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9526987979 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233083771844 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071473699792 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742811455467 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122348346536 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759952085682 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.