Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Learning another language at early ages is a topic that has been discussed these days. Being bilingual or multilingual in childhood had some pros and cons but in my point of view, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.
There are several advantages of learning the second language in childhood. First of all, children have much more free time and they are not busy with heavy educational courses or their careers, so they can concentrate better on learning and clearly learn the language more efficiently. For example, an employee has a time limit for learning English because he has to work full-time and fulfill his duties first then focus on learning English. Second of all, young children are not afraid of making mistake and they do not have high expectation about learning a language perfectly and fast. They even could have games and fun during learning the language. Third of all, being bilingual in early ages provide fluency similar to native speakers and lead to better job opportunities or educational qualification in the future. In my perspective, the pros of acquiring a language in primary school are highly beneficial and worth it.
On the other hand, second language acquisition has some disadvantages for children. In fact, it may lead the child to have confusion and it makes him trouble to have effective communication or emotional expression. Moreover, becoming bilingual in childhood provide cultural discrepancies. For example, in some countries, the weekend is on Thursday and Friday but in some foreign cartoons, it demonstrates the weekend on Saturday and Sunday. Thus the child cannot distinguish exactly when the weekend is and what is the reason for such differences.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments about the advantages and disadvantages of acquiring a foreign in early ages, I profoundly believe that its pros outweigh the cons because it is much easier to be bilingual in childhood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Ania Pe. | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | bob ngo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 73 | view |
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 88
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- variety of qualified workers from the year 1995 to 2020 61
- Crime rate in most countries is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas Why do you thing that is What can be done to reduce the crime rate 81
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tes the weekend on Saturday and Sunday. Thus the child cannot distinguish exactly wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, third, thus, while, as to, for example, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20952380952 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9088894259 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536507936508 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3135060286 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27361114679 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853077108874 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585059205151 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141115437997 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348378347635 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.