Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of children's education, which has always debatable, has now become more controversial. With many people claiming that it is beneficial, others reject this nation. The substantial influence of learning a foreign language in childhood has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the latter propositions appear to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of picking a language in early age and thus will reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that compelling children to learn is correlated negatively with anxiety. According to startling new research, for example, which undertook by a prestigious university the more forcing the children to learn the less their brain improve.
There are some pitfalls, however, that negates this argument and which can be certainly overwhelmed the potential influence of being bilingual or multilingual in childhood. But the most alarming one is rooted to the fact that jack-in-all-trades Approaches to deal with these concerns which are numerous but the most effective one is great future job opportunities which is impracticable and unattainable, but comprehensive and feasible. As an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals that thinking about the future job from primary school might hurt the child's characteristics or traits.
In a nutshell, one can reach a conclusion that learning various languages might be beneficial. So prominent is the impact that children's anxiety, which a number of drawbacks should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-22 | mirzaasif88 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | SB83 | 72 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | sasikumarkbt | 77 | view |
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Many people prefer to live in their own house while others are prepared to live in rental properties Discuss both views give you own opinion and examples 89
- people usually mix private and professional life. what are the pros and cons of that? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, thus, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53816793893 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14502195579 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8595782259 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.916666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133012294559 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489347115965 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330669420623 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812954325653 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160660204275 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.