some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning the foreign language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that learning in primary school highly beneficial, issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that high speed of learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the second language standpoint, the first language can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that bilinguals, as well as mother tongue, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the foreign culture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both monolingualism and multilingualism can be seen.
Within the realm of broadening child horizon, communication tools might increase the consequences of language barriers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mental growth relate to this reality that the demerits of the brain function pertain to the high rate of learning. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of enabling intellectual property is correlated negatively with acquiring additional languages. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the minority of languages.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning language in the earlier age far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of linguistic skills prove the significance of learning forever, but also pinpoints of code-switching implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-22 | mirzaasif88 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | SB83 | 72 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | sasikumarkbt | 77 | view |
- some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? discuss your views. 88
- in a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. does a common man suffer from a groups ideology?express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 11
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 85
- cultural shock is a new worrying concern for new immigrants, what are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 88
- if you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/ subject will you choose? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73643410853 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32125990879 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9527498706 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131470503781 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410618370432 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380450082874 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073143180089 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443230846393 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.