Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they that the children should only read serious educational book. What is your opinion?
There is not doubt that reading comprehension is an important skill that every student should acquire to excel in their career. However, some opine that students, who read books for entertaining purpose, are literally wasting their precious time while their academic lessons are pending. This essay will evaluate this aspect and reach at a sensible conclusion.
To begin with, acquiring knowledge is a time-consuming process, and one's entire life is not enough to gain a deep knowledge in a subject. In such situation, some parents argue that allowing students to read insignificant books for fun is irrational and is a total wastage of their priceless time. On the other hands, many of the entertaining books are also informative. For example, Balarama, a children's weekly comic magazine, helps many a student to pick up their language skills in more pleasurable way, and, thus, these students become more competent in their sphere.
Besides, for many students, reading books for entertainment acts as a catalyst of their success, for these books facilitate them in reducing pressure that academic subjects exert on their personal life. To exemplify, a study conducted by an Indian university revealed that when a student actively engages in an activity for a considerable amount of time, his concentration level starts to diminish gradually with respect to time axis. In order to overcome from such a situation, reading other pleasurable books, except academic books, will refresh their thought and avail them to be more active.
To sum up, even though studying academic lessons is an inevitable task of every students for their career, allocating a significant duration of time for reading other books is also important for their success by refreshing their brain and acquiring knowledge outside their curriculum. As such, it helps many a man to be more competent and creative in nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | wamujonelo | 78 | view |
- t has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative source of energy (wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development? 90
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they that the children should only read serious educational book. What is your opinion? 78
- Online education and training are becoming increasingly popular in the business world. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'deep knowledge'.
Suggestion: deep knowledge
... ones entire life is not enough to gain a deep knowledge in a subject. In such situation, some p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2904290429 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84461646758 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4958441335 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280461642273 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110451927917 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931009990779 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194021436351 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244675404928 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.