Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Childhood is one precious part of human life and it is made vibrant by parents who love to present numerous toys to their little kid. Having lots of gaming equipment are a blessing as a youngster gets the chance to play with diverse items and additionally, they get to know about numerous colors of changed objects. However, giving many options can be damaging for a kid as they cannot distillate on one particular sports for certain periods. I believe that limited toy options are beneficial for little kid.
Primarily, prospect to play with manifold games is always exciting. For example, playing with a toy car for the extended period may be monotonous but if there are options to play with dolls then it may be hilarious. Therefore, it is important to have diversities of toy to make the moment pleasant for little players.
Secondly, altered colors of unalike games are always beneficiary for a young child. For instance, a toy car’s color may be red whereas a doll’s color may be green, blue etc. and the dissimilar objects create impact on fledgling mind which significant for proper mental development.
On the flip side, an undesirable impact can be created on young mind because of numerous gaming objects, such as, a child unlikely to play with single toys. This psychological change is not good for mental expansion because in the long run, they may become too unstable to complete a single task.
In conclusion, it seems that, some haphazard can be created on young mind for varieties of toy. However, a child should pass their time playing with colorful toys which is expected by every parents. In my opinion, balanced quantity of toys could mitigate all problems.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 73 | view |
2022-04-03 | aceg1000 | 56 | view |
2022-03-19 | minhhh123 | 73 | view |
2022-03-13 | minhhh123 | 61 | view |
2021-11-30 | giang123456 | 56 | view |
- Many people prefer to travel by car rather than buses or trains.Why do you think this happens?What can government do to motivate people travel by buses or trains? 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views a 78
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities?You should give reasons for your answer using your own 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93356643357 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66132614567 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5751230659 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230153099558 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871727235743 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394540866122 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140568227853 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526229220495 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.