Some people argue that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and increase conflicts between nations. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.
There are two different attitudes towards the role of competitive sports which are held between nations. Some believe that they can have positive impacts. However this idea is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support competitive sports as an effective way to gather people from different countries cite the various benefits. These range from culture introduction to increase the global unity. For example, during world championships which are held every four years, the athletes from all countries gather together not only to compete but also to show their cultures worldwide. In addition, these types of competitions make appropriate opportunities for countries to know the abilities and facilities of other nations which can be shared between them to gain more power.
By contrast, the opponents of the idea point that competitive sports cannot bring unity at all. They believe that during a competitive sport, two nations are put against each other, indeed. Thus, this situation contributes to increasing conflicts between them. Examples can be seen in some contests which contribute to arguments when one of them can win the prize. Furthermore, another argument is that if competitive sports was replaced with friendly ones, they would be more beneficial to introduce nations to each other.
Overall, it seems obvious that although competitive sports have a lot of benefits universally, they cannot make a calm situation to introduce cultures. This is because in the competitive situation individuals just focus on winning the prize.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | javerriaawan | 89 | view |
2019-11-30 | Sogol | 67 | view |
2018-09-05 | sahilverma16 | 89 | view |
2018-08-25 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
2018-08-25 | yaarnick | 84 | view |
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won t work Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 61
- Many people believe that reducing the speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are measures that could put in place? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ve that they can have positive impacts. However this idea is not entirely straightforwa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the debate and give a concluding view. On the one hand, those who support compe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42366412214 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8395740966 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0749218094 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278950842677 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089443040652 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426360711725 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1559249693 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433863451779 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.