Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher pollution. Whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both the views and give opinion.
Environment is not a national asset. It is shared responsibility of one and all. Some of the people believe that huge taxes should be levied on industries as they creating more pollution whereas others opined that a myriad of practical fixes exist exit for this issue. I will shed some light on both the views and then give my opinion.
On the positive side, taxes should be collected from industries as they create a lot of pollution in the terms of noise, air etcetera as compared to others such as households. Nowadays most industries dispose of their waste directly into a pond or river, consequently, water get polluted and will be no longer hygienic for drinking. By imposing heavy taxes, pollution can be controlled up to some extent as they will become more careful in future. Moreover the smoke coming out of chimneys also creates air pollution. For example the Taj Mahal‘s white marble has changed its color to yellow due to the pollution created by nearby industries. Therefore government should be imposed taxes to overcome it, as otherwise they will kill national heritage.
On the other hand instead of collecting taxes, industries should be bound to set up pollution control equipment. As higher taxes increase only the product prices which is ultimately at the end bared by the consumers. Moreover government should define some restricted areas where industries should be banned such as households. In addition pollution control standards can be fixed and regularly checked by officials. On the violation, high penalty can be imposed.
To sum up, I pen down saying that, although there are plethora of reasons for imposing high taxes on industries but it is not a pragmatic approach. As huge taxes only add the government and its official’s personal property not fix the pollution. According to me, instead of taxes, pollution control fixes should be taken into consideration before the clouds on horizon turned into perfectly storm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-21 | RUPINDERKAUR | 93 | view |
| 2018-05-21 | RUPINDERKAUR | 78 | view |
- One of your friends invited you for a meal with his her family in their home You enjoyed the meal and had been happy to be introduced to his her family Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend and say that you enjoyed the meal say wh 73
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel to other places to learn about other cultures. Others say that books, films and the Internet can be used as a source of information about different cultures.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your an 89
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher pollution. Whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both the views and give opinion 93
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 44
- One of your friends has asked you to be a partner in his new business.Write a letter to reply friend's offer. In your letter*Give your opinion of your friend's offer business idea*Tell him whether or not you have decided to accept his offer*and explain yo 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s shared responsibility of one and all. Some of the people believe that huge taxes should b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...extent as they will become more careful in future. Moreover the smoke coming out of chimn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...hey will become more careful in future. Moreover the smoke coming out of chimneys also c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pollution created by nearby industries. Therefore government should be imposed taxes to o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to set up pollution control equipment. As higher taxes increase only the product ...
^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...tely at the end bared by the consumers. Moreover government should define some restricte...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...should be banned such as households. In addition pollution control standards can be fixe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ersonal property not fix the pollution. According to me, instead of taxes, pollution control fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10869565217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80917916782 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3689668306 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3888888889 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259286627597 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772788112309 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584940863925 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165247651097 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473587800213 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.