Some people believe that development of business results in a loss of cultural ties between countries. Other people contradict this belief. Give your opinion.
The development of business, according to some, has had a negative impact on cultural ties between countries. I strongly believe that the above thinking is not appropriate and rise in trade and commerce between various nations has gradually increased the cultural ties among them. In the following paragraphs, I intend to put fourth my arguments to support my view.
We cannot deny the fact that due to globalization of world we could get the knowledge of different cultures prevailing around the world, the reason how we got this access is because of development of business between countries. For example availability of international goods for everyday person also gives some hint about the likelihood of other cultures which as a result gives curiosity to travel abroad to know more about what interests them. On the whole the statement is quiet contradictory that business between countries ostracize cultural ties between them.
Moreover, another point to consider is that cultural ties that already existed are not necessarily disturbed by the business. For example development of business of transportation between countries has encouraged people to travel from their home to far off places and know more about cultures around the globe. Furthermore, it has also influenced the tourism industry and people as of today have become more keen to know about different cultures and their rituals all because of this development.
Although, business may throw spanner in works with regard to international relationships from time to time, but it cannot undo the deep cultural ties between countries that evolved and enjoyed over time.
To encapsulate, I am of the opinion that ups and downs of international business must not effect long term cultural ties between countries and business muddle should not interfere with societal tie-ups of countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Karan.gulati07 | 73 | view |
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas, in the past, people used to repair damaged things and keep them for a long time.Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? 61
- FILMS CAN HAVE EFFECT ON THE CHILDREN s EDUCATION AND TEACH THEM MANY THINGS DO YOU THINK IT IS ALWAYS A POSITIVE INFLUENCE DISCUSS 63
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework?Do you agree or disagree? 78
- More and more people nowadays are buying tickets for sports and cultural events. Is it good or bad? Give your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f business, according to some, has had a negative impact on cultural ties between...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...orld, the reason how we got this access is because of development of business between coun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...owns of international business must not effect long term cultural ties between countr...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f international business must not effect long term cultural ties between countrie...
^^
Line 8, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uddle should not interfere with societal tie-ups of countries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for example, as a result, on the whole, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36860068259 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89586773263 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5038058501 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364824441897 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130343179287 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643194727176 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182908443994 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511253689608 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.