Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific, research and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important to be shared.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
While one school of thought believes that people should be able to share all information in scientific, business and academic worlds, other view is that entrepreneurs ought to odd all vital information. I agree with the former opinion because publicizing how a work or procedure was done can stimulate fresh ideas or imaginations, as well as eliminate bias.
One section of the public believes that letting everybody know how a project was carried out is desirable and I concur because such a situation can encourage innovation and creativity. Intending businessmen and scientists can build on the available pre- existing knowledge or product to recreate a better material, which will uplift the betterment of mankind. For example, Thomas Edison publicized how he invented the incandescent bulb which made it extremely easy for modern researchers to innovate their low - energy version. Another reason information should be readily available is that the public can positively criticize erroneous aspects of the work and offer tangible recommendations. Most times, some elements of subjectivity or inexposure to other variables can render an idea or a book invalid, and so when such a piece of work is open for public criticism, people can actually soft the errors, correcting the mistakes and thereby, improving the quality of work.
On the other hand, another view is that by making some information privy, cogent secrets would not become leaked to dangerous and unscrupulous individuals in the society. There are people ready to steal business ideas or reproduce innovative products without having to add any improvements. People who hold this view fear successful organizations that reveal their managerial secrets would soon start losing its numerous faithful customers to budding businesses, who would use such strategies as marketing campaigns. In the same vein, there would be an overabundance of fake products as people can easily produce copies of the authentic materials even if they lack relevant experience, expertise and raw materials. Most academic books, for instance, have been plagiarized by false authors. Thus, making information available to a wide range of the public is totally dangerous according to this opinion.
In conclusion, although it is thought by one group of people that what the public knows about an innovation or research should be totally streamlined, i believe it is expedient for everybody to have tangible information about useful processes and events on how a work is being done
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific, research and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important to be shared.Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development,but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages. 89
- As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of timeTo what extent do you agree. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovements. People who hold this view fear successful organizations that reveal the...
^^
Line 9, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lack relevant experience, expertise and raw materials. Most academic books, for ...
^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the public knows about an innovation or research should be totally streamlined, ...
^^
Line 13, column 153, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...research should be totally streamlined, i believe it is expedient for everybody t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39898989899 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98741828466 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593434343434 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1553966367 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.714285714 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187896539479 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630266753588 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576358981863 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12728531421 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350799356316 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.