Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is important to consider that how the buildings of the past should be utilized. Many people contend that restoring them would be heavy on their pockets and it would be better to replace them by newly constructed buildings. However, I partially agree with this argument as some heritage sites should be reserved for cultural and economic purposes.
One of the major reason for demolishing old buildings is that their poor conditions. Such buildings can be damaged easily in some natural calamities and fixing it for future use could be a waste of money. In addition to this, such buildings should be monitored by appropriate government authorities so that if someone purchases such constructed sites, they should inform them that it needed to be reconstructed. Furthermore, the space of these sites can be used for other purposes, for example construction of schools, parks, offices or shopping malls which might generate more jobs around the area.
Nevertheless, some ancient sites have good base structure, hence it should be kept for restoration purposes. As these buildings can be used for the purpose of enhancing tourism by preserving heritage way of construction artefact. Additionally, they can be restored into heritage hotels and resorts as well. To illustrate this, in many countries around the world, they have kept their historic constructions as an artefact, which generates enormous tourism in their countries.
To sum up, although restoring all old buildings would definitely be an expensive call; especially if they lack strength in them. In my view, some of them should be restored as a cultural heritage of the past to boost economic activities such as tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-20 | balwinderbuttar01 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | abanoubEmil | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | sahilrocks11 | 61 | view |
- Most companies and organizations required their employees to wear uniform to work What are the jobs that need this uniform to make it a good thing What are the disadvantages of wearing uniforms to work 61
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. 56
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns leaving only old people in the countryside What problems are caused by this issue What can be done to solve this issue 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an artefact' or simply 'artefacts'?
Suggestion: an artefact; artefacts
...ve kept their historic constructions as an artefacts, which generates enormous tourism in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, as to, for example, in addition, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26199261993 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93157582028 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9546599645 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17574304844 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820426205717 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524194091581 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131046732701 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434180514538 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.