some people believe that technology has made man more sociable and others think it has made less sociable.
Discuss both the view points and give your own opinion.
It is ubiquitously known that technology has taken mammoth dimensions in each and every walk of human life ever since the globalisation took place. A section of society considers it a positive turn in improving the way of interaction while others are more suspicious about its repercussions owning to several reasons, elucidated in the ensuing segments along with my personal perspective.
First and foremost benefit of technology in terms of communication is that it has reduced the communication gap. To be more precise, one can have easy access to near and dear ones over video and voice calls through WhatsApp, Facebook and many more social applications; which are proving a panacea among foreigners. In this case, people who live far away countries, do not feel homesickness. As per world health organisation, for instance, approximately 87% people have overcome homesickness ever since the introduction of technology in being sociable. Not only this but it also saves the time and energy. By this this I mean masses need not to pursue visiting terms since they can interact to one another via electronic gadgets like mobile phones instead of wasting time to meet each other at particular places.
However, some people advocate that electronic communication has reduced the actual bonding among masses and classes. To illustrate, people avoid spending quality time with their closure ones and indulge in making online friends who sometimes deceive them. Thus, they do not value even their family members. What is more, over usage of technology in being sociable has increased the generation gap. In such situations, people, especially children become selfish and show less care towards their elders which paves the way to isolation among grey people.
To recapitulate, after analysing both the view points I vehemently vouch that although technology is proving boon in maintaining long distance relationships yet its detrimental effects can not be overlooked . Hence, only wise use of technology is commendable in maintaining the relationship otherwise it may be hazardous for people in various aspects of life.
- scientist have been warning for many years already that in order to protect the environment people should use less energy however most people do not change their ways of living what is causing this behaviour how can people be encouraged to change 84
- plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea Some people think that they should be banned do you agree or disagree 78
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings This money should be spent on modern buildings instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that a person s success depends on his her upbringing by parents Do you agree or disagree 76
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course of University education others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work Do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 608, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...t it also saves the time and energy. By this this I mean masses need not to pursue visiti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pursue'?
Suggestion: pursue
...gy. By this this I mean masses need not to pursue visiting terms since they can interact ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...etrimental effects can not be overlooked . Hence, only wise use of technology is c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, for instance, i mean, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34431137725 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96230720531 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646706586826 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2013839292 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149063219092 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439403121553 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364570409264 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825664709469 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171904732485 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.