Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free. Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Internet has become an inevitable part of people’s lives. It is a widely held belief that government should be given free net to their citizens, but there is a strong counter argument amongst sections of the people that there will be a paid subscription for World Wide Web like other utilities services. However, I am of the opinion that this is a matter to be debated in the light of several factors before the reasonable conclusion can be drawn.
The first and the foremost reason is that free internet increase the overall quality of life for everyone for poor people, who do not easily access to the internet. Not only people could communicate more convenient via the internet but also do they could entertain without spending too much money on leisure activities.
The second worth mentioning reason is that there are vital tasks, ranging from financial transactions with banks to research and education, which could only be accessed via the internet. It is not fair that people be deprived of these services because of financial issues.
On the contrary, there are certain group of people who vehemently contend that there should be fees for using web. The government should be used that funds to sectors with higher priority, such as improvement in infrastructure, state education system, or healthcare facilities. Furthermore, if people oblige to pay for their usage of the internet, they would surf the web or download files responsibly, but when the internet is free of charge, people would not care about their usage anymore.
To conclude, after analysing both the views I am of the opinion that, although there are some demerits for cost free web for everyone, I believe that it is a practical plan, and the government should provide free internet to public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | sonclhoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | drmona.914 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | rakib007 | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | el-naz | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | NRS | 78 | view |
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusiveideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with therecommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 33
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Peter Jones In order to relieve Briggsville s notorious traffic congestion Mayor Harrison Peter Jones plans to build a multi million dollar subway system The subway will run through the major 73
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
... On the contrary, there are certain group of people who vehemently contend that t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01683501684 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67701966076 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8306175072 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.454545455 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436520346931 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143239717845 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703163571102 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215946183872 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413514550596 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.