Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example, working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
There is a belief that highschool students have to do community service which they are not paid in their curriculums. I partly agree with this.
On the one hand, if there is community service in highschools, their students will be benefited. First, community service participation can develop student's softskills such as communication and teamwork. We all know that, in highschool in Viet Nam, students go to school just to listen and write down dry lectures. There are fewer activities in classes to engage students together than in community work. As a result, students who work for community service tend to talk more and work in teams better than those who do not. These sets of skills will be advantageous for students when they graduate and join the workforce. In addition, for those who want to study abroad, a background with records of having completed some community service gives them a leg up on ordinary applicants.
On the other hand, in my point of view, community service which does not pay salary should be optional for students in highschools. The first reason is that students in highschools usually spend most of their time in school and have to do their homework. They often stress from studying. Therefore, they regard community service as a burden because it does not bring about any developments. If students spend too much time on doing community service, their academic performance can be reduced. Moreover, it is worse if students are not paid. They will feel bored, angry. This leads to them not taking responsibility for their work and doing it well. Their actions can affect others in the community.
In conclusion, although doing unpaid community service will receive many benefits for students in highschools, I believe it is not obligatory to have these activities in curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | pourya | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-10 | buivuongngoclinh | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | Lu Min | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-10 | Anupama Barooah | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | khushbu1407 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70241661399 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 300.0 20.2975951904 1478% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1493.0 106.682146367 1399% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 300.0 20.7667163134 1445% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 109.0 7.06120827912 1544% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214233086069 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214233086069 0.084324248473 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145165156583 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415977233385 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 152.0 13.0946893788 1161% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -224.56 50.2224549098 -447% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 119.1 11.3001002004 1054% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.25 8.58950901804 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 122.0 10.1190380762 1206% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 10.7795591182 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.