SOME PEOPLE PREFER TO LIVE IN A HOUSE, WHILE OTHER FEEL THAT THERE ARE MORE ADVANTAGES TO LIVE IN A APARTMENT.
ARE THERE MORE ADVANTGES THAN DISADVANTAGES OF LIVING IN A HOUSE COMPARED WITH LIVING IN A APARTMENT ?
Some men and women would prefer to live in a house, while some others would say that living in an apartment is more beneficial. This essay will argue that despite the higher maintenance cost of a house than the apartment, I believe that the health benefits of living in a house far outweigh all its drawbacks.
The main drawback of a house is its high upkeep cost. This is because expense such as the cost of maintaining garden and salaries of security guards is paid only by the owner of the house, whereas in case of a flat, these type of expenditure is divided among all the members of society. For example, a report published in The Hindu revealed that in Delhi flats owner spend 63% less money on monthly maintenance than the house owners. However, I believe that people can take care of these expenses just doing gardening by themselves and installing CCTV cameras for security purpose.
The main merit of living in a house is good health. That is to say that most houses have a garden and because of this, people get fresh and clean air to breathe. Hence, residents of these houses do not infect from the air-borne disease. For example, a research paper published by the Indian Medical Association showed that people staying in houses have 57% less chance to infect from the air-borne disease compared with those who are living in the apartments. This benefit means that living in a house is worthwhile.
In conclusion, while the primary drawback of living in a house is its high maintenance cost, no fear of air-borne disease is the main advantage of it and this merit of staying in a house is far outweigh any drawback.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | ggnsaini08 | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | ggnsaini08 | 61 | view |
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 78
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 73
- Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 84
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What are the factors that contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 61
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ost houses have a garden and because of this people get fresh and clean air to breat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that living in a house is worthwhile. In conclusion, while the primary drawbac...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, so, whereas, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66089965398 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48742963448 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.735787801 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328702754343 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127469971122 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118940066813 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213102584904 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141126951058 0.056905535591 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.