Some people prefer one-on-one lessons. While other FIFA groups discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In recent times the debate is heated on preferred ways of learning. A few individuals are in favour of personal training while others cast their choice on learning in a group. This essay will discuss both the sides of an argument and will give a concluding view.
On the one hand, the proponent of the classroom training cites various benefits. Firstly the classroom consists of students from varied backgrounds and places. So whenever a new concept is being taught in a class then learning through a group discussion could learn different views on a topic from a wide angle. As a result, students could build a broad knowledge base which will be helpful to them in their career. Finally, learning in a group promotes competition among students. This will bring the best talent out of them which is good for society and individuals.
By contrast, those who support personal teaching claim that it brings personal attention to students, meaning that a teacher has only one student to focus on. Hence, tutor could gauge better understanding of progress and mastery of students. In addition, students could clarify their doubts fearlessly without hesitation which otherwise would have been in group training. This has been confirmed by study in the psychology state 85% students are comfortable when they are alone.
Overall, group studies bring about broad study of the subject and competition while single study results in personal attention and fearless interaction between them. It seems that the decision should be taken based on considering the learner's preference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hitakshi patel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Skinny | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Skinny | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Skinny | 56 | view |
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose some solutions you think would be effective 84
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him or her develop and why give details in examples in your explanation 61
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him or her develop and why give details in examples in your explanation 61
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him or her develop and why give details in examples in your explanation 61
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him or her develop and why give details in examples in your explanation 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nts from varied backgrounds and places. So whenever a new concept is being taught in a clas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...hould be taken based on considering the learners preference.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21960784314 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67370466864 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6328942716 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152195191677 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445904619301 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456727255504 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935218787655 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638249221649 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.