Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by some that educational institutions at all stages spend maximum term focusing on a student's theoretical understanding rather than developing real-world tactics. I somehow disagree with this thought, thus believe that adequate attention is paid towards acquiring practical know-how. Moreover, learning societies throughout all stages are detrimental that candidates inculcate non-theoretical skills by exclusively including the following two into curriculums; related tests at schools and summer internships while graduating.

Not only the bookish knowledge but the practical assessment is also an area of focus at elementary and high-school grades. Pupils are acquainted with the application of what they have gained from textbooks. For illustration, the science lab provides with the resources to experiment with the help of actual chemical reactions, physics equipment etc. Computer labs offer a platform to try the coding languages they have learned during lectures. Conclusively, nongraduates develop through non-theory arrangements and facilities with the help of their teachers.

Moreover, universities, on the other hand, expects the course applicants to take summer internships. These mandatory internships held between academic years is one of the most effective ways for learners to practice their understanding of the subjects. For instance, financial institutions select apprentices from the colleges, and if interns perform well, they end up getting a full term job offer. Hence it is rightly said that degree courses are the best way to get a career started in addition to earning a degree.

To conclude, lectures prepare a person for a bright future by giving a firm foundation of theoretical concepts and hands-on experience, therefore, speaking personally, I do not agree with some people who think teaching is just about factual development and not usable knowledge.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-07 sanjugohel 73 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-09 Tejwani 11 view
2019-11-08 Tejwani 73 view
Essays by user abhisheksaxena :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...l stages spend maximum term focusing on a students theoretical understanding rather than d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y end up getting a full term job offer. Hence it is rightly said that degree courses ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79359430605 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17718864379 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708185053381 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0949691106 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138316962248 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396902441086 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309280906357 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074368643288 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317927485762 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.