Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
There is an issue about the level of care allocated to wildlife. Some politicians state that humans spend overly on it. This essay disagrees with their viewpoint.
Let us start with the reasons why some politicians argue that people protect animals excessively. The first justification is that the number of endangered species is decreasing. Many species are no longer at the threat of extinction, but most protective organizations still demand the same amount of financial support. Another reason is that the poor need the effort made on the wildfire security. Many people, who live in poverty, need more help from the government, so it should rationally turn its attention to them rather than to thriving animal population. Furthermore, it is impossible to rescue some animals. There are a few biological species that are too late to save, but people are unreasonably spending both many resources and money on it instead of kindly letting them go.
However, some wildlife institutions state that authorities should keep maintaining programs designed to guard biodiversity. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, poaching is increasing in popularity worldwide. Many hunters are willing to squander millions of dollars to hunt on animals in the Red Book, so the cease of funding would put these species under extinction again. Secondly, they also shield the environment against polluting business. Besides animals in the wild, they normally contribute to the protection of their habitats, which many businessmen try to take control of. Moreover, they basically participate in nurturing growing generation to be friendly to other creatures. These organizations frequently visit schools to communicate the idea of saving the wildlife, but if they did not get money from officials, they would stop this healthy activity, and children would not learn anything about endangered species.
In conclusion, even though some politicians suggest stopping financial backing of animals at risk, I think that human beings should continue, until they become completely friendly to other species around.
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 78
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 73
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes Should these new homes be built in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside 60
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does it cause?What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 78
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51533742331 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89029988321 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0828927457 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6315789474 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202276639862 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503448514716 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435839501096 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105895421232 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048217807346 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.